Video Goodness, Homecoming Style

Written by Sean Hawkins on .

Good afternoon Cougs.  There's a lot of good video out there this week, from KXLY and otherwise.  But here's something else to add, just a quick-ripped video from the trusty DVR.  This is from the all-access show last night, with some good sideline audio.  Maybe most of you have seen this already, but if you haven't, check it out:



Oh, and for those of you who think Wulff is a little "stoic" on the sidelines?  Think that maybe he doesn't get fired up enough, doesn't yell or carry on or get in anyone's face?  Check him out around the 5-minute mark.  Maybe those on the inside of the program see it more than we do, but whoa, I don't think we've seen that side of him a whole lot, have we?!  I like it.

Enjoy the rest of your day, and GO COUGS!

Toward Parity In College Football: The Awful Eight

Written by Coug-A-Sutra on .



Hello Followers. Hope you are having great week.

As for me, well, lets just say that I'm looking forward to greener pastures.



And, unfortunately, the same can be said for our beloved Washington State Cougars.

For this reason, I began to think about a few policy changes that the NCAA might employ to help out programs in similar predicaments as ours.

So, if you're interested in how the NCAA might work to create NFL-type parity in College Football, Read on..

Paul Wulff Radio Show Recap - Kinda?

Written by Sean Hawkins on .


Greeting Coug Nation.   Normally this would be the too-long & drawn out Paul Wulff radio show recap, where coach Wulff addresses all things Coug in an informal, non-press-conference type setting.  But this week was a little different.  Instead of your usual coaches show, they kept coach Wulff for a couple of segments, then, well, they basically turned it into an info-mercial telethon type deal for the Martin Stadium renovation project.  Assistant AD Johnson sat in with Bud Nameck, and they discussed the importance of getting Phase III done.  Former players like Jack Thompson, Drew Bledsoe and Marcus Trufant called in to lend their support to the project, talk about how nice it would be to have the next phase done, etc.  But that's pretty much it.

Here's a little of what Wulff did say.....

Tuesdays With Moron - Bye Week Edition

Written by Sean Hawkins on .



Hey, it's bye week.  Might as well drag out Tuesdays with Moron?  And for something a little different, we'll assign a number of "Simple Jack's" for each Moronic moment listed.  And feel free to chime in if you agree or disagree with any of this dribble.  You can even vote and call it the "Moron of the Moment", something like that.  There's a lot to laugh at out there, so let's go.

1) PAC-10 Officials - So I'm sure many of you have seen it already, but they are calling it the "Miracle at Montlake".  Gross.  You know the drill, but AZ is leading 33-28, and with a couple of minutes left in the game, the Mildcats have the football.  QB goes back to pass, throws it at the feet of the receiver in the flat, ball hits his heel and pops up into the air, UW linebacker grabs it and races into the endzone.  Ballgame.  But wait, the replay officials take a long, hard look at it, and determines that....it's a touchdown?  Really? 



Maybe it's me with my simple mind and all....but that looks like the ball has made contact with the turf, right?  The sad thing is that this call gave UW the game.  But you know what?  UW was actually the victim, sort of, the week before!  Notre Dame had scored a late 4th quarter TD to take a one-point lead, and as the coaching handbook says, you go for two in order to make it a 3-pt game, therefore you can't lose on a field goal.  Notre Dame tries a run up the gut, and initially the running back appears to be stopped, but a late surge in the massive scrum pushes him across the goal line, giving the Irish a crucial 3-point lead.  UW would drive down and kick a field goal to force OT, and the Irish would pull it out.  But there is now visual evidence that the Notre Dame running back's knee hit the ground around the 1-yard line!  Yet this play was not even reviewed? 


That gold thing around the 1-yard line in the picture is the running back's knee, clearly laying down on the grass.  The foot of #6, Desmond Trufant, that is the goal line.  Does that really look like he got in?

The PAC-10 refs were calling the Notre Dame game, although there was a Big East replay official in the booth.  But it was a pure PAC-10 crew (read: stupidity) in the UW-AZ game.  But man, talk about a pair of lousy calls or what?  They even gave WSU a sideline penalty on the first play of the game last week?  I was at that game and have absolutely no idea what happened, other than a coach chewed out his own player as he was coming off the field.  Don't they usually issue a warning in something like that first?  That was one of 16 penalties in that WSU-ASU game.  Someone did a study last year I believe that showed how the PAC-10 is the most penalized conference in the BCS.  Why?  I thought the PAC-10 was supposed to be this soft, frat-guys-throwing-the-nerf-in-the-circular type of league, not a bunch of thugs assaulting people every play?  Ugh.

And this is just a couple of examples in the last few weeks, but there are so many more that have been awful we can't even list them out here.  Being a ref isn't easy, I'm sure, and the PAC-10 refs have been accused of throwing the flag for what appears to be virtually nothing.  Just listen to Jim Walden's "Awwwwww!" every week, and you'll get the straight poop from a salty old veteran who gets driven CRAZY by these guys.  But ask yourself, why do we have replay anyway?  Ummm, to get the calls right? They talk about the need for "indisputable evidence" to overturn a call or whatever, but you have to wonder what the hell they are actually looking at up there?  I'm a know-nothing blogger, but even I can see with my own two eyes on both of these crucial, game-turning calls that they didn't get these right.  And for that, PAC-10 refs, you get two Simple Jacks.....



There's more, you know, after the read more thing....

Blog Poll Monday, Etc.

Written by Sean Hawkins on .


Good morning Coug Nation.  Here's hoping the start of the one and only bye week of '09 is finding you well, as we all rest our bumps-n-bruises from a long, tough stretch of games.  And what a stretch it's been through the first six games, when you consider the following:

1) We've played probably the three best teams in the conference, already, in Oregon, USC and Stanford. 

2) Two of our out-of-conference games were against the run-n-shoot, possibly the worst possible match-up you could dream up when you think about our defensive personnel on the field or, more importantly, on the sidelines with injuries.  Combined total yards surrendered against SMU and Hawaii?  Well, it's a lot - over 1,100 yards, all told, but we were amazingly 1-1 in those games! 

3)  After all the hand-wringing over turnovers and the lack of this team creating them, did you know we currently LEAD the PAC-10 with 18 takeaways??  That includes 11 fumble recoveries, tops in the conference, along with seven INT's. 


But sadly, we've actually given it away 20 times, so we're still on the negative side of the ledger at minus-2.  Better than last year, when we led all of humanity with a minus-25 turnover ratio!

Read on for the weekly blog poll, plus other stuff....

HomeComing Post-Game Thread

Written by Coug-A-Sutra on .

Well, today our Cougs lost a semi-interesting/competitive contest to those underwheling Devils of the Sun, 27-14.

All in all, not a bad performance considering the amount of injuries to our offensive line as well as some awfully untimely turnovers.

So, feel free to fire away your comments regarding Wulff's idea to punt with 5:00 left in the fourth down 13, as well as any other observations or concerns you might have.

Here are mine:

1) This is the second real game (e.g. Pac-10) where we've been one score away from really being in it.  So, where our development is concerned, Step 1 is to figure how to get that extra touch.  Step 2 is to figure out how to actually win if and when we get within 7.

2) Per SeanHawk and Hooty, we still look AWFULLY slow.

3) Chicken S* is as Chicken S* does. As much as many of us want to back Coach Paul--And I sure do, part of getting kids to believe in themselves is making sure that they know that you believe,

So, even if you don't make it on 4th down from your own 38, at least show your boys that you have confidence in them to make a play, and FLIPPING GO FOR IT!!

Otherwise, onto the bye week.  This game shows that we can stick around lower division teams on any given day.

And despite some slips, we are getting better.


SeanHawk says:

Good work Sutra. 

The whole thing was predictible in the sense of how we were going to get dominated up front, but this was beyond men vs. boys.  If you didn't see it with your own two eyes, it's even hard to just describe how manhandled the offensive line was for the vast majority of that game.  It was actually pretty amazing to watch.  ASU twisted and stunted and came after us with a serious intensity.  I was hoping they might be a little flat after losing to OSU last week and then coming up into low-40's weather?  Uh, no.  And the scary young linebacker, Burfict for ASU?  As advertised.  There was one play where he was double-teamed on a blitz, and even though he hurdled the running back and was shoved by the guard, he STILL stayed on his feet and got to Tuel.  Seriously athletic, seriously strong.  There was another play where I believe Lobbetael found Gino Simone on a 15-yard slant, and Burfict came from one side of the field all the way to the other and finished off the tackle in just a complete blur.  That guy is the real deal.

I feel for Jeff Tuel.  I mean that kid was under duress when he took the snap on, well, probably 80% of his throws he had to move to get some space or flat-out throw on the run.  He made a poor decision on his second interception, but he had two defenders dragging him down when he floated the ill-advised pass into the flat.  Clearly a true frosh mistake.  But how else is he going to learn than by going out and making those mistakes?  Can't do it with his arms folded on the sideline while Lobbestael is in there.  So why pull him at that point, who the heck knows?  Maybe the coaches were watching how bad it was going up front, just like everyone else in the stadium, and wanted to keep the kid healthy to an extent, and/or not completely shell-shock him at such a tender age?  It couldn't have been because they thought Marshall would do better than Tuel at that point, especially with the fierce pass rush and absolutely ZERO running game behind him. 

Sutra and I have joked in the past about the 1990 Apple Cup, when UW was really good and we were pretty bad with the QB drama and all that.  Anyway, that UW team whipped us up front so badly that night in Pullman, that at times, it seemed like UW was going to get to Bledsoe before the snap!  Maybe it wasn't exactly like that, but I have to admit, it was pretty close.  Twelve sacks and minus-54 yards rushing is twelve sacks and minus-54 yards rushing!     

And Sutra is right on the lack of speed assessment.  TV doesn't even do it justice, but when you see it live and from a distance, where you can take in the whole field?  It's just incredible how overall this team is lacking burners.  Forzani actually ran away from the ASU db on that 99-yarder, and that was cool to see.  That kid CAN run, it's true, and with some experience, who knows what he can do.  But otherwise, there is a complete lack of explosive athletes right now.  I know, you've all seen that and have been saying it all season long, but when you see it live, it's a tough reminder of where we are.

The defense did do some good things at times.  The takeaways were nice, with an unreal SIX, but it would have been great if they led to more than seven points directly related to the takeaways?  And ASU is kind of struggling at QB right now, as they were shuffling their QB's in and out, trying to get something going.  That young QB, Brock Osweiler, is a flippin' GIANT though, jeez.  He's got a serious fastball too.  I can see why people have been calling for him down there, as he looks the part.

There were some weird things out of the defense.  They didn't attack, as we hoped they would.  But there were moments where Hooty and I both noticed that we dropped NINE into zone coverage, rushing just two down linemen, and ASU still did the job by finding the soft spots in the zones and moving the ball in key moments.  Neither of us could recall WSU ever dropping nine into coverage, except maybe vs. Hawaii or SMU in a prevent-type defense.  I've seen Cal do that a few times with their 3-4 defense, but never from WSU.

And finally, on the decision to punt with 5 minutes left?  What's odd is that, if anyone remembers, the defense held them after the long TD pass, and got the ball back with over 6 minutes left to start that possession.  There was actually a little bit of energy in the crowd, where the thinking was "hey, they come down and score again, this MIGHT be a ballgame?"  And then to get to 4th down with 5+ minutes left and the choice to punt, it just felt like the wrong thing to do in terms of pure momentum, etc.  Maybe the coaches handbook says that you punt in that situation, but there was a deflating feeling in the crowd when the punt team jogged onto the field, that's for damn sure.  Sometimes you go by the book, sometimes you have to go by your gut.  But that's why Wulff gets the several hundred throusand in annual salary, and I'm here typing.  :) 

Anyway, we still had a good time.  There are some positives to cling to, such as Tuel's two TD passes, or the fact that they did take the ball away six times.  And the overall consensus from people we talked to after the game was that they were pleased with the effort, and that the players still aren't quitting or anything.  It's good to see them come back and play better in some phases after last week.  But still, we are very far, far away until we are in position to actually win games like that.  I think the numbers are helped by the 99-yarder, and you can't take plays off the board.  It happened, just like any other game where big plays happen.  It's football.  But IF you look at the game on a whole?  It's not hard to see that we still have a LONG way to go my friends!

Football Friday - Week VI of XII

Written by Sean Hawkins on .

Greetings Cougs!  Welcome to yet another Football Friday.  After tomorrow's game, it's six in the books, six to go, and that's all she wrote for 2009.  We'll lament/rant/complain/whatever about the first half of the season all next week, but until then, there's one more game to look forward to.  And it's homecoming, hooray.  Homecoming in Pullman can be fantastic, especially on a crisp, early-October Saturday.  The whole experience, top-to-bottom, it's what college football is all about. 

Anyway, here's our takes for this week.  Enjoy!

LONGBALL SEZ:

Can it Finally Be Tuel Time...Already?

Hello Cougar Nation, Longball here to prognosticate, pontificate, enunciate and hopefully illuminate another Football Friday. This is one of the greatest Football Fridays of the year because it's Homecoming on the Palouse! Does anyone remember back in the day when all the Greek houses would make huge papier mache sculptures in their yards? What happened to those? Fortunately not all traditions have fallen by the way side, and this weekend Amieable and I plan to soak it ALL in by inaugurating our first annual pre-game Campus PUB CRAWL! We intend to hit all 4 bars, Ferdinands, the tailgates AND the field House, so stay tuned for a full report right here in the coming days.  Those of you who couldn't make it this year are welcome to live vicariously through us.


Now on to the football stuff; This week the Cougs are looking to bounce back after not even being competitive in Eugene last weekend. What a sorry excuse for a football game that was. Anyone who was worried for Jeff Tuel's health having a frosh string bean left tackle watching his back side, had their worst nightmare come true when Tuel went down HARD early in the game. Fortunately, it looks like he's back this week and thank God for that. If there is one thing we have learned by now, it's that Marshall Lobestael is not going to take this offense anywhere. Unfortunately that's about where the good news ends for the Cougs. While one of the injured O linemen, Brian Danaher, seems ready to return this week, we are likely to see the same starting lineup on the O-line. Since ASU brings a nasty looking defense to Pullman, you may want to start stretching the old cringe muscle now. Because Tuel is so good with his feet, there is always the hope that he can burn an overly aggressive pass rush forcing them to ease up, and that he can avoid taking any really hard direct shots. Hope. It's pretty much all we got left at this point and we ain't got a lot. But it's Pullman, so we do have a lot of beer. Silver linings for us Coug fans are likely to come in the form of an ice cold Silver Bullet.

Read more....

Wulff or Tedford? Who Ya Got?

Written by Matt Wessel on .



Happy Thursday to you Coug Nation.  We are happy to have a guest writer today, someone who's been a regular contributor to comments lately.  Say hello to Matt Wessel, better known as "WSU91" around here.  Matt had an idea for an article, but he did so much of it himself that we thought it would be better that HE tell you all about it.  So, here we go:

I sense a lot of frustration about the Cougars and our coach, Paul Wulff.  Cougar Nation is restless.  But let's put these last two Cougar games into perspective by comparing them with the last two Cal games against the same two teams.  If you compare Cal's box scores versus Oregon and USC to our box scores against the same two teams, you might be surprised by what you see.  Here are the stats:

Against USC in Berkeley, Cal rushed for 86 yards, and threw for 199 yards.  They had 17 first downs, and possessed the ball for 23:14. 
USC rushed for 174 yards and passed for 283 yards, and had 20 first downs.  USC won the TOP battle, 36:46 to 23:14.  
Cal had two turnovers, USC had one.  Final score, USC 30, Cal 3.

In the Coug game against USC in LA, WSU rushed for 85 yards, and threw for 144 yards.  WSU had 18 first downs, and won the TOP battle 36:09 to 23:51. 
USC ran for 156 yards, threw for 247 yards, and had 14 first downs. 
The Cougs had three turnovers, USC had two.  WSU lost 27-6

Cal scored their only points on a late field goal, and were intercepted by USC on their opening drive at the USC goal line.  WSU scored its points on a late TD, and was also intercepted at the USC goal line early in the 4th quarter.  WSU also missed a field goal at the end of the first half on Tuel's first drive in the 2nd quarter.

In comparing these two box scores, I would argue that the Cougars faired better against USC on the road than Cal did vs. USC at home.  The TOP stat was really surprising.

Read on for more....

Paul Wulff Radio Show Recap - Week VI of XII

Written by Sean Hawkins on .



Greetings Coug Nation.  Wednesday already, as we barrel down the stretch towards ASU, and ultimately, the midpoint of the '09 season.  I'm sure we'll have plenty to chew on after this weekend's game, and we can try and digest the first half of the year.  But enough of that talk.  Another radio show in the books with Bud Nameck and Paul Wulff, so, we'll get right at it.  As usual, the top ten things to take from the show.  Here we go:

What's Up With Kevin Norrell?

Written by Sean Hawkins on .



So a lot was made late last week about the possible reinstatement of LeGarrette Blount.  Apparently Blount has gone out of his way with his parents and even involved a lawyer appealing the situation, trying to get back as an eligible member of the Oregon football program.  And, for whatever it's worth, it appears that it might actually work for Blount, as Chip Kelly has now been quoted as saying it's a "human being" story now.  Blount has some things he has to do to get back on the team, however, some believe he may return in early November. 

Now hang on a minute.  Blount punches out some loud-mouth Boise State player who popped off to him after the game, and then goes absolutely ballistic in the melee that ensued, all on national TV?  It was sports-talk-radio fodder pretty much across the country for a few days, and Oregon suspends him for the year....and now he may come back?  Mmm-kay.  Whatever, I mean it's Oregon's program, and they are closer to the situation than anyone else.  They are aware of the circumstances, they are the ones dealing with Blount.  And they are the ones who will deal with any consequences/fallout.  I guess the bottom line is that hey, if Blount has done the crime, but is also doing the time accordingly, well, then maybe he should get the sentence reduced for good behavior?  It happens all the time in the real world, where prison sentences are sometimes cut in half due to good behavior.  If Blount is playing by the rules set out by Oregon, and clearly he shows remourse for what happened, maybe they can work it all out.

But all this reinstatement talk got some Coug fans wondering what's up with Kevin Norrell?  We all remember we lost Kevin for the season when he made a terrible mistake after the season-opener, where he did some things he shouldn't have done in the wee hours of the night.  Here at this blog, we have lamented his loss on the field, and how things were really lining up for him to have a big impact on the wide receiver situation for this year.  He had a great fall camp, and now when you look at Jeshua Anderson's decision to quit football, you start to understand what his loss has meant to that group of wideouts.  Norrell was going to start coming into the year, and having him out there along with Jared Karstetter, Daniel Blackledge, Gino Simone and Jeffrey Solomon would have made for a nice, young, athletic core of WR's that sets up nicely for today AND tomorrow. 

I don't think we can sit here and flat-out defend his actions.  A DUI isn't anything to sneeze at.  And we won't do that here.  But he's young, an 18-year old sophomore right now.  He made a mistake, and now he's paying the price, suspended by the team for the season.  Per coach Wulff, at the time of the suspension, they declared Norrell's situation "would be re-evaluated at the end of the semester", which of course, is after the conclusion of the 2009 football season. 

As to Kevin Norrell and what is going on right now, well, believe it or not we heard from Kevin Norrell senior.  Mr Norrell was kind enough to contact us and give us an update on what Kevin is up to right now.  Yes, that's a picture of Kevin above, in the WSU t-shirt.  Can you figure out who the Pro Bowl WR's are hanging out with him?  Think Cincinnati Bengals-Seattle Seahawks and you'll know who they are (psst- Ocho Cinco and TJ Housh).  The other guy in the picture is a JC middle linebacker from California named Adrian Ferns, who according to Kevin's father, is currently being recruited by PAC-10 schools.  Anyway, not only did we hear from Kevin's father, but we also heard from Kevin himself on where he is in this whole process.  Read on for more.....