Keeping Your Enemies Closer, UW Edition
Written by Longball   
Tuesday, 04 May 2010 08:21


"There are many things my father taught me here in this room. He taught me: keep your friends close, but your enemies closer. " –Michael Corleone


Well played Mr. Corleone.  Friends close, but your enemies closer.  Got it.  With that in mind, I've checked in with Amieable's cousin Tom, a died in the wool Husky Honk, to see just what is going on over in Montlake this Spring. As you all know, in any great sports debate, as we are prone to get into with our rivals in purple, there is nothing more annoying than the fan who doesn't even know what they're talking about. So pay attention Coug fans. It's important that we know our stuff.  Here's what cousin Tom has to say.

Longball: So Tom, you are a longtime Husky fan, just how many Spring scrimmages have you attended over the years?

Cousin Tom: Honestly, this was my first year attending any spring event.  I think I’m like most Husky fans in that spring games were just never that big of a deal.  


Longball: So being a Husky fan here on a Cougar blog, I gotta ask... are you scared? Well, are ya?

Cousin Tom: Depends.  Does my big cousin Amieable have my back?


Longball: Just like a Husky to try and hide behind a woman!  Kidding, I admire your courage, even if I despise your taste in football teams. So being Cougars, we are naturally curious (whether we admit it or not) about how the Montlake Makeover is going so far. Much like my beloved Amieable and our own resident dawg commentor, JasonUW, you are a reasonable and fair minded Husky fan, so we're counting on you to give us a fair assessment of the state of things over on the dark side. No pressure.....


Cousin Tom: Things are going pretty good so far.  5 wins last year was more than most people (including myself) expected, and Sarkisian has brought in a great recruiting class.  The staff has also done a great job in developing the players we already had.  I don’t believe that Butler or Te’o-Nesheim get drafted in the 3rd round if the previous regime was still around, and I know that Locker wouldn’t be hyped as the #1 pick in next year’s draft if Ty was still at the helm.


Sark has also got people excited about the program again.  I don’t think I’ve ever seen a fan base so excited over a team that went 5-7 the previous year and hasn’t been to a bowl game in forever.  There were 15,000 people at the spring game even though it was cold, wet, and windy.  I don’t think that has ever happened before.

All that being said, I think the Huskies are still at least few years out from competing for Pac-10 titles.  There is still not enough talent on the roster, and I think Sark needs more experience as a game day coach (some of the coaching decisions last year during games were, uh, a bit questionable).

Longball: Very interesting. Now we've heard a lot about this Locker fellow. On this side of the mountains he is generally regarded as a noodle armed, brain dead, bed wetter, more suited to be a shift manager at Burgermaster than the field general of a division I football team. Apparently, Husky fans and NFL scouts disagree, but what do they know? After seeing Locker in person this Spring, what can you tell us about how he looks? Bed wetter, or Jesus in Cleats?

Cousin Tom: Well, if I have to pick between the two, then I choose Jesus in Cleats.  J  Locker has always had the physical tools.  He’s big, he’s fast, and he has a strong arm.  His problems essentially boiled down to decision making and accuracy (yeah, I know these are pretty important).  Last year, he did much better in those areas.  He still needs to improve on his accuracy a bit more (last year he was at 58% completion percentage), and make some better reads, but I expect he will have an excellent year.   It helps that the entire offense returns around him (well except one lineman and a fullback), so he should have some good chemistry with his receivers which will help.   Probably not worthy of Heisman consideration since the Huskies won’t win enough games, but a top 5 NFL draft pick is very likely.

Longball: We have a friendly wager here on the blog between our own Lucas and purple commenter JasonUW, that the WSU defense will actually rank higher statistically this year than the Dawgs defense. Lucas didn't even ask for odds on that, so we've had him committed, temporarily, but in his defense the Husky defense was anything but dominant last year. What do you think of this year's edition of the purple people eaters based on what you saw this Spring? Would you take that bet?

Cousin Tom: Dominant is one word I would NOT use to describe the Husky defense this year.  How about "adequate"?

I do expect the Huskies to finish in the bottom half of the Pac-10 statistically in defense, but the hope around Montlake is that now that the players have a year of understanding the new system under their belts, they’ll start playing faster and better.  And the defense really did play pretty well during the spring game, although the conditions favored the defense in that it was very windy and wet, and the QBs were down on touch.

I expect the Dawgs will be similar to last year - give up a lot of yards, but force teams to kick a lot of field goals.  They should be able to continue to force a fair number of turnovers.

To answer your second question - I probably wouldn’t take the bet because I wouldn’t trust the Cougar defense.  

Longball:  Every year there are bound to be some impact new comers that nobody who doesn't follow a program closely is aware of until they start making headlines in the Fall. Some of these impact newcomers wont arrive until Fall camp, but did anyone emerge this Spring that we should be aware of now in preparation for our showdown on December 4?

Cousin Tom: We have two true freshman running backs which impressed everyone in the spring, Deontae Cooper and Jason Collier.  I only got to see Cooper, but in one practice I went to he had two impressive touchdown runs, and also scored another touchdown in the spring game.  They’ll both be behind Chris Polk on the depth chart, but should get a fair amount of playing time as the season wears on.   

The star of the spring game was Anthony Boyles.  He technically isn’t a newcomer because he’s a redshirt sophomore, but his first couple of years here he was stuck deep on the bench at WR.  Late last season he was moved to CB and this spring played very well.  During the spring game he had a fumble recovery, an interception returned for a touchdown, and a couple of big hits.  He’s got 4 other guys at CB who have starting experience that are ahead of him on the depth chart right now, but he’s bigger than all of them (6’3”) so I expect he’ll get a lot of playing time, especially when the Dawgs have to go up against bigger receivers.

Longball: Besides the previously noted quarterback controversy and crumbling wreck of a stadium, tell us what you think will be this year Huskies Achilles heel, and what plan, if any, do they have to address it before September?

Cousin Tom: The defensive line is the big concern.  The Dawgs lost their two starting defensive ends to graduation, and another kid who was expected to come in and contribute got suspended for assaulting a guy.  And this spring two more players who were expected to be key contributors on the line were out with injury.

For the fall the injured guys should be back, and a couple of freshmen are expected to come in and contribute right away, which will help a little.  Even with those guys coming in, there are still big concerns with depth and experience.  There was also some experimentation with moving a tackle to end, and even a couple of the linebackers to end to try to give the defense some flexibility, but I'm not sure if you'll see much of that during a game.

Longball: What about the Spring game impressed you the most? Or, what are you least worried about this year?

Cousin Tom: The running game is what impressed me.  Our starting tailback is out for the spring and the QBs aren’t really allowed to run, but the rest of the guys really ran well.  The backup tailback Johri Fogerson and 5th string Demitrius Bronson had good days running the ball, getting a lot of yards after contact and hitting the holes well.  And true freshman Deonte Cooper scored a touchdown.  With Polk coming back, and Locker’s legs getting to be part of the offense, I think the running game will be very good this year.


Longball: So tell us, what are your expectations this year? What would you consider a success, and what would have us talking you down off the Montlake bridge?

Cousin Tom: I think the Huskies can go 8-4 this year.  Given the tough schedule (@BYU, @Oregon, @USC, @Cal, Nebraska), that might be wishful thinking, but I think they have a good chance.  For me, success is any bowl game.  Preferably a nice bowl game, but I’ll even take the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl.  Just get to a bowl game.  Failure is not improving from last year, and therefore not making a bowl game.

If Jake Locker gets hurt I’ll have to wait in line to jump off the Montlake bridge.


Longball: Well Tom, you've been a real sport. Thanks for giving us your perspective. Our last question for you is the obvious... are you brave enough to come to Pullman for Apple Cup this year?

Cousin Tom: The last time I went to the Apple Cup in Pullman was in 2000…are you sure you want me there?  My plan is to go.   Can I crash at your place?  J

Longball: 2000? Funny, I dont recall there being an Apple Cup that year. You're always welcome to stay. I'll be sure to stock the dog house out back with some fresh blankets and milk bones for ya. See you in December!

Go Cougs!
Trackback(0)
Comments (25)Add Comment
...
written by Kaddy, May 04, 2010
Guys, you're killing me...an entire column dedicated to the purple pups?

Longball, buddy, be careful about speaking for all of Cougar nation when you say we're curious about what goes on in Montlake. I couldn't care less...seriously.

Still love the blog, but I definitely skipped today's column. (Yes, I know there isn't much going on for material right now)

Understood Kaddy
written by SeanHawk, May 04, 2010
There won't be much on them around here, you know that. We have this, and then the spring fish wrap, and that is it until AC week that you will see on them. We thought it could be interesting to hear what the other side is thinking and knew it wouldn't be warmly received by some, so I get your reaction.
Sorry Kaddy...
written by Longball, May 04, 2010
But i have to completely disagree that Coug fans "don't care" about what's going on with their chief rivals. Spend 5 seconds on the Cougfan boards and I think you'll see there's really no debating that. Remember, if we're 1-10 on December 4, this will be the "only game that really matters anyway", so no harm in keeping tabs on what we're up against.
Hate the Purple, Not the Playa
written by amieable, May 04, 2010
What makes this blog different (and I'd say more fun) than the pure statistics blogs out there is the "color." Funny stuff and off the wall stuff is what garners the huge hits the blog gets, including from girlfriends, moms and the more casual readers on facebook who aren't X and O people. It's accessible enough for a rookie fans, yet there are also detailed posts to satisfy the die-hards. I came for the funny stuff but now know enough by reading that I can hold my own at a game and not embarrass myself!

Hell my mother reads it. She's historically hated football but last year came to a game, enjoyed herself and asked informative questions about defense. We were stunned and I believe my dad offered to write Sedihawk a thank you card.

So don't lose all the color. I for one don't want this to be a blog where there are "rules" about what people can and can't talk about. I like that it's all fair game.

Hate the Huskies but don't hate the blog or the blog writers!
...
written by money d, May 04, 2010
Having all the husky fans line up on the aurora bridge, not the montlake one will achieve favorable results!
You forgot...
written by JasonUW, May 04, 2010
A few other notes from the spring:

Positives:

Receivers - I can't believe I am saying this, but we have the best group of receivers in the Pac-10. With returning junior and 2nd-teamer Jermaine Kearse, junior Devin Aguilar, and true sophomore James Johnson, not to mention senior De'Andre Goodwin, Jake will have a lot of weapons.

Tight Ends - Juniors Kavario Middleton and Chris Izbicki lead a two-headed monster. The former is the pass catcher and the latter a solid blocker.

O-Line - Four starters and two contributers return from an improved unit last year.

Coaching - Year two of the Sark era should provide Husky Nation with something to do in late December besides watching Romar's crew tearing up the Pac-10.

Negatives:

Linebacker - With Butler and Savannah gone, we only have two players with significant experience here. Senior Mason Foster and junior Cort Dennison. The OLB spot will be either converted WR Alvin Logan or converted safety, the oft-injured Victor Aiyewa. If anyone gets hurt, we only have freshman answers.

End - Not as bad as Tom makes it sound, as our best DL, Cameron Elisara, moved to DE this spring. With Elisara, returning starter Talia Crichton, and Thompson/Alrich returning in the fall from injury, we should be ok. However, QB pressure will have to come from LB blitzes, not one-on-one DE matchups.

Quarterback - Huh? Weakness? Well, Jake is one tackle away from his last play as a Husky. With former backup, Ronnie Fouch transferring to Indiana State, the current #2 is RS-FR Keith Price or FR Nick Montana. Both will be great UW QBs, but are a few years and 20 lbs away from being successful at this level. This is one of the more interesting position battles. Hope is that Price can hold the #2 spot and we can redshirt Montana. I think his dad was a linebacker or something.

Go Dawgs.
LOL.
written by Cyberhwk, May 04, 2010
"I think the Huskies can go 8-4 this year. Given the tough schedule (@BYU, @Oregon, @USC, @Cal, Nebraska), that might be wishful thinking,"

You THINK?!?!?! They'd have to sweep the rest of their schedule which includes games @AZ, and vs. Oregon State and Stanford (respectively #2, 3, #4 in the PAC-10 last year).

Dawgs will be closer to 4-8 than 8-4. smilies/cool.gif
If Montana wins the #2...
written by Longball, May 04, 2010
Does Price look to transfer?

At least Tommy qualified his 8-4 as wishful thinking. Im certainly not going to bag on him for that since i thought the Cougs were going to win 3 last year! But I'm not so sure that they don't handle OSU, AZ and Furd. Its Pullman on Dec. 4 that they need to be worried about.

How about that stanford @ UW game... is it the top 2 QBs in the draft head to head? I think Andrew Luck is acquiring quite the fan club in Pullman these days, what with him being widely considered the foil to Locker's dreams of Davey O'Brien/Heisman/#1 pick, etc.
Record
written by JasonUW, May 04, 2010
I think we will go 7-5. Wins at BYU, Syracuse, UCLA, Arizona State, at wazzu, Stanford, and either Arizona/Oregon State.

Losses to Nebraska, at Oregon, at USC, at Arizona/Oregon State, at Cal.

That's not too out of reach. Right? smilies/smiley.gif
BTW
written by JasonUW, May 04, 2010
If we do win at BYU and then at home against Syracuse, the thought is that Gameday will be in Seattle for the Nebraska night game. Giggity.
5-7
written by nwfan6, May 04, 2010
I just don't have that much hope for a season much better than last. Last year could have been 3-9 and 5-7 was over acheiving. If the defense improves 2 spots from it 7th place finish in the pac-10 it is still only fifth. The offense will be improved, but 7 of the 10 offenses are predicted to be improved over last year and the top two offensive teams in the conference last year are also returning 8 starters. Unfortunatly the big jump in the conference was made last year and any meaninful improvement in the conference this year is wishful thinking.
Someone go check the montlake bridge...
written by Longball, May 04, 2010
for nwfan06! He may be going over any minute!
...
written by Tom (Amieable's cousin), May 04, 2010
Couple things on the 8-4 record...

-There were 3 games the Huskies should probably have won, but lost (ASU, Notre Dame, UCLA). They could have easily been 8-4 if they can get a measly yard against Notre Dame, manage the clock better against ASU, and have officials that realize when a ball hits the ground it isn't a catch against UCLA (or, have a coach that can call a timeout to facilitate a review).

-Nearly the whole team is coming back. Lost 3 starters on defense and 2 on offense. With some new talent coming in, I truly believe this team is way more talented than last years.

-The coaching staff is all back, and have another year of experience. This was Sark's first year as a head coach, and it showed at times. There is also another year in the system for the players.

@BYU - we should beat BYU. They are likely going to start a true freshman QB and lost their top RB for breaking school rules. Lucky we get them the first game of the season.

@Cal - We get Cal late in the season, and they always seem to fall apart late (maybe that's why the Dawgs beat them 42-10 last year when the Dawgs had nothing to play for but Cal did).

Oregon State and Stanford are probably tougher games, those teams just aren't getting the national respect they deserve, so I didn't include them. Plus, they have to come to Husky stadium. Huskies were 6-1 at home last year.

7-5 is probably more realistic, and JasonUW has a pretty good breakdown game by game. But I think the Dawgs have another upset in them besides those 7.
I wonder..
written by Longball, May 04, 2010
If you invented a time machine and had early-in-the-season Oregon State play late-in-the-season Cal, would either team win?

I gotta say i love the news about the Dawgs linebackers and d-line. We have seen what having a lack of bodies up front can do to a defense, not that they are in the same dire straits. Elsewhere, especially the skill positions on offense, they could be downright scary. Who needs Locker when you have a stable of young running backs like that? For some reason I still have faith that the receivers will find a way to drop 30% of Locker's passes that hit them in the numbers. That will give us all the ammunition we need to criticize his accuracy.
...
written by Soze, May 04, 2010
Ok, ok... that's enough. Time for some new posts to bump this one to the bottom, where the Dawgs belong.
?
written by SeanHawk, May 04, 2010
But if a uw fan says they could have easily been a bowl team , well what about the AZ game with the fluke TD off the wr's foot/turf? What about the USC game with a bunch of red zone turnovers and SC without Barkley at QB or Taylor Mays? Flukes can go both ways. Uw lost some they woulda/coulda, but won a couple in the same manner. Can't have it one way and not the other. Think of the ND or UCLA losses as a way of the football gods keeping it all in balance!
Cal
written by Portland Coug, May 04, 2010
Cal always falls apart late? What was the score of Cal - UW in 2008? I think Jahvid Best just scored AGAIN.
...
written by LucasCoug, May 04, 2010
Tom, I am pretty sure both Stanford and Oregon State are in the Top 25 polls shown on ESPN. Thanks for contributing though. I love to hear unbiased/non honk perspective on the Dawgs...
...
written by Tom (amieable's cousin), May 04, 2010
How come no one mentioned my dumbass typo about the Huskies home record? 5-2, not 6-1. Seriously, how dumb was that??

Longball - good call on the drops by the wideouts. I saw a couple during the spring game. Something to watch for, especially in Pullman in December...

Agreed on the fluke games. The Huskies had 5 close games that could have easily gone the other way, and went 2-3. 3-2 and they were a bowl team.
Statistically, the Huskies should have been a .500 team. Over the course of the season, they gave up about the same number of yards as they got, gave up about the same number of points as they got. As you might guess, I blame coaching for going 2-3 in those games instead of 3-2. Maybe I'm hoping too much that the staff learned from their mistakes, andor the team is more talented to help offset some of those game management miscues.

Portland Coug - Your argument for Cal not falling apart late is beating an 0-12 team with a coach that had already been fired? Really? I would have gone with looking at last year's game log and said the 2009 UW game was a fluke...

...
written by Tom (amieable's cousin), May 04, 2010
LucasCoug - good call, I didn't see that on OSU and Stanford. I was basing the 'not enough pub' thing on various blogs and fansites.
not sure how unbiased I am, but I certainly try to be realistic. Maybe 7 months from now you can all give me a big "WE TOLD YOU SO, YOU BIASED IDIOT" after the Huskies go 4-8. If I can get tickets to the Apple cup, you could even do it in person! smilies/smiley.gif

And, for 11 weeks out of the year - Go Cougs. Especially against the Ducks.
...
written by gohuskies, May 05, 2010
ALL I KNOW IS THE HUSKIES ARE GOING TO BE BETTER THAN THE LOWLY COUGARS. AND BY THAT I MEAN RECORD WISE, OH AND BY THE WAY WIN THE APPLE CUP DECISIVELY.
Well, thanks
written by SeanHawk, May 05, 2010
Thanks for that gohuskies. And in ALL CAPS too, so you are definitely YELLING AT US! I guess since you know the future, there is really no reason to continue. Thanks again.

Seriously, how in the world can a team that hasn't had a winning season since 2002 start throwing around all these wins they should have next year? You guys finished last year on a great note, there is no denying that. But it still wasn't a winning season. And you weren't even close in losses to the Oregon schools, or Stanford for that matter. All those programs, plus USC, Cal, even Arizona, they are all way ahead of you in the grand scheme in terms of recent success and at least making a postseason appearance or two.

Now give your program a couple more recruiting classes like last year, then talk of 8 wins - at least - is understandable. But it just seems awfully cocky after 5-7.
...
written by JasonUW, May 05, 2010
Great points about the close wins versus close losses. I believe we were a 5-7 team last year, but those 5 wins and 7 losses definitely didn't come from where I initially thought.

Re: Price. He won't transfer if he is the #3. He's a young kid that reminds me of Darren Thomas of Whoregon. He just doesn't have the size yet, while Montana looked great in the spring game. 21-34 with two tds.

Really looking forward to checking out Pullman in person in December. I'll leave the wine/salmon back at the UW tailgates and stock up on Busch.
Re: JasonUW
written by Soze, May 05, 2010
Bring a pint of whiskey too, for your 7am coffee. We start early.
...
written by du doan bong da, May 06, 2010
Thanks for that gohuskies. And in ALL CAPS too, so you are definitely YELLING AT US! I guess since you know the future,
----------------------
du doan bong da | du doan worldcup

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Follow Us

WSU Football Blog on Facebook

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!