Tuesday, July 28, 2009

The Magnificent Front Seven? Or Something Else Entirely?


Time to glance at the defensive front of our beloved Cougs. But instead of doing just the D-line or just the linebackers, I thought what the heck, do the entire front seven. And for good reason, I guess. I mean really, both sets of positions rely heavily on each other for success. The linebackers rely on the defensive line to plug up holes and/or occupy blockers long enough to fly to the ball and make plays. And the d-line, if they do their job? They still need competent, strong-tackling linebackers who are capable of getting to the ball and making the play. Both positions need each other, and together they complete the heart of any defense. They are almost one with each other, one feeding off the other's success. But will it be a "Magnificent Seven" up front? Or something else entirely?? Let's see...

First of all, it better be said now, and let's just get this out of the way - the defense was abysmal last year. I mean how else do you explain the 43.9 points per game allowed, 118th in the country? The 247.6 rushing yards per game allowed, 119th in the country? Hey, passing defense wasn't too bad, at 195.8 yards per game allowed, or 44th in the country. But let's be honest, I mean the team was buried so deep and so early that many games saw teams doing nothing but student-body-right/student-body-left for half of their possessions. USC even took a knee at the 15-yard line of WSU before the half.....things were THAT bad.

I don't think any Coug fan who watched them all season would argue against that statement, and many inside the WSU program would probably agree. Of course there were many circumstances as to why they were so bad, such as a madly ineffective offense, injuries, suspensions, blah blah BLEH! The list is too long to accurately point out every single thing that was wrong, so, you get the gist. In a nutshell, what could go wrong, did go wrong in '08.

So let's get to it. We'll start from the inside out, meaning defensive tackles, defensive ends, and then the linebackers.




D-tackle rotation:
Some starting combo of Bernard Wolfgramm, Toby Turpin and Josh Luapo. If Wolfgramm is healthy, he will start alongside Turpin to form a thick, talented interior. Wolfgramm is pushing 290 lbs on his 6-3 frame, while Turpin checks in at 6-4, 285. The buzz from last year was that Wolfgramm was the best defensive lineman on the team, and Turpin wasn't far behind. But even as injuries and other off-the-field issues hurt last year's defensive line, Wulff resisted the urge to burn Wolfgramm's redshirt. And now that move, hopefully, will pay off!


Other unknown or relatively unproven backups are (potentially) Dan Spitz, Justin Clayton and Anthony Laurenzi.

D-Tackle analysis: Starting to see a little depth develop here. Contrast these guys with what you saw for most of '08, and it's a whole different world inside. Wolfgramm redshirted, and Luapo didn't even enroll until January of '09, following the gray shirt route. And Turpin came on strong at the end of the year, but he didn't really play until the last month of the season.


All that said, '09 could still see this group as not-yet-ready for prime time. While Wolfgramm redshirted last year, and it's great that he did so well and all that. But we're talking about practice. PRACTICE!



Seriously though, he still hasn't had a snap of PAC-10 football. And he had a balky shoulder that kept him out for some action this spring, so who knows what kind of shape he'll be in by the opener. I know I'll be keeping my eyes peeled for how he does in August camp. While Luapo is big and all that, a fire-hydrant type at 6-0, 325 lb, like Wolfgramm, he hasn't seen any PAC-10 action either.


Defensive Ends: Kevin Kooyman and Jesse Feagin are projected starters.

Defensive end analysis: Hmmm. Well, we like Kooyman. He has had some injury issues over the years, and started seven games last year. Kooyman is good-sized at 6-6, around 250, but isn't exactly hell on wheels in terms of getting up field and rushing the passer. He is more of your all-around type of defensive end who isn't a huge playmaker, with 31 tackles and one sack last year. It's hard to believe he's already a senior isn't it? His career has absolutely flown by. He was regarded as one of the top recruits in the state when he came on board under Doba and company, regarded as a good guy, and last year, there was considerable buzz that he was set for a big '08 season. It just never happened. He is the undisputed leader up front this season, and here's hoping he goes out with a bang in '09.

Feagin is another interesting case. Reportedly adding 16 lbs of muscle in the off-season, now near 270 lbs, he could make an impact right away. There is always some speculation that with the added weight, he could slide inside on passing/nickel situations, as a smaller pass-rushing defensive tackle. But it's likely he'll be at the top of the depth chart, opposite Kooyman as a starting defensive end. Feagin, like Kooyman, is also a senior. He played sparingly as a JC transfer in '07, just three tackles in nine total games, and then missed last year due to academics. We've heard good things about Feagin over the last two+ years, so now we will find out what he's really got in the tank.

As for backups, I would speculate heading into camp that Casey Hamlett, the transfer from Western, and Adam Coerper, the redshirt frosh who was the scout team defensive player of the year last year, will be the first d-ends off the bench. Hamlett was profiled in the spring as to opening some eyes with his high-energy approach. The opportunity is right there in front of him, and to go from playing at Western WA to being a regular in the defensive end rotation on a BCS school in one year has to get his heart racing! Coerper, meanwhile, is another kid on the rise, a youngster who has drawn praise since he arrived in Pullman. One of those nice, athletic frames at 6-4, 250, in the versatile mold who could play tight end or defensive end, the redshirt frosh has a real shot at regular playing time.

For a real young sleeper/long shot for '09, Travis Long must get mentioned here. Long was one of the top recruits signed in February, and while he hasn't yet put on the pads, there are some that believe he could see action as a true frosh. Long is, yet again, another one of those tall (6-4), athletic build-type kids at 245 pounds who can play tight-end or defensive end. He projects more at defensive end at this level, so, it's at least possible he'll open enough eyes in August to potentially get on the field in September.

Sadly, this is where we must mention Cory Mackay. Mackay had a big spring on the field, and was looking like he was headed for a lot of PT this fall. Then the terrible car accident a few months ago, and his life has changed for the foreseeable future. I would encourage you all to go check out the Cory Mackay fund group at Facebook, which has now grown to over 1500 members. They have done some good fund-raisers, such as car washes and even a hair-cutting service for donations, and the news has been positive there. Still, he has a long road ahead, so all our thoughts and prayers go out to Cory Mackay and family.

OK, that's it for the d-line. Now, the linebackers.

Starters: You can book Andy Mattingly at strongside linebacker and Louis Bland at the weakside position, provided they are healthy? Alex Hoffman-Ellis and Mike Ledgerwood will battle for the inside. As for backups, we would do a lot worse than Myron Beck. Nine starts last year at strongside backer, now pushed to backup status with the Mattingly move back from defensive end. Hallston Higgins is in there as well, likely backing up Bland at the weakside.


Mattingly on one side and Bland on the other could be one of the best OLB tandems in recent times for the Cougs. They are both recognized as two of the best players on the defense, and it will be interesting to say the least at the idea of seeing them both starting from day one. However, injuries area already an issue here, as Cougfan broke a story the other day that said Bland is still nursing a bum knee, to the point that it could cause him to miss the season opener (damn). And Mattingly missed time this spring, and now has a lot to prove as he moves back to linebacker after a failed move to defensive end last year.

This is it for Mattingly, a player two years ago some pegged as a can't miss star at linebacker. I include myself in that group who thought he was going to be the "real thing", but last year was a loss on many levels. They finally moved him back to linebacker at the tail end of the season, and the defense overall did perform better vs. ASU, UW and Hawaii to close out '08. Most of all, Mattingly simply looked more comfortable, almost like going home again, and should have a nice finishing kick to his up-and-down career at the strong-side position. Bland, if he can keep that knee right, looks like an absolute player on the rise. Sized like a strong safety at 5-10, 205, Bland has the heart of a lion and hits like a truck. 55 tackles, nine for loss as a true frosh last year in nine starts had him on some frosh All-American teams. The kid is a real bulldog and should be a strong leader for years to come.

The youthful match-up at middle linebacker is going to be something to watch. Mike Ledgerwood played in 10 games last year, and logged 14 tackles with 2.5 for loss in limited time behind Greg Trent. We like the looks of Ledgerwood, a solid 6-0, 225, and appears to be another young player on the rise. But Hoffman-Ellis is going to give him everything he can handle inside. The JC transfer who arrived last year, he and Ledgerwood are going to be in for a real fight for the honor in replacing Greg Trent in the middle.

As for some younger breakthroughs, it's hard to say. Maybe a super-strong Darren Markle will emerge in the middle? Markle is a high school weight-lifting legend, with a 605-lb squat video making the Youtube rounds. 605 lbs!?!? That's ridiculous strength. I would imagine trying to move him out of the middle is akin to trying to take down the Martin Stadium goal posts, complete with cement reinforcements. Good luck.

It is a younger group of linebackers, no question, and losing Greg Trent, Cory Evans and Kendrick Dunn thins out the depth. But if they can stay relatively healthy, they will be fine. And of course, the better the play is in front of them along the line, the better this group will do overall.

As an overall, I would say this group of front seven is in much better shape than last year. In '08, they were too young, too light, and too few in numbers to compete against BCS talent. While six of the top eight projected in the two-deeps at defensive line are new faces for '09, normally that isn't a recipe for success. But I think this is a unique situation. Last year they had lost Andy Roof before the season started, so backups like Matt Eichelberger were thrust to the forefront. The personnel just wasn't up to the challenge. Now, there is talent that is new, sure, but still it's talent that has been on campus and in the system for a full season up until now. Bernard Wolfgramm, Jesse Feagin, both guys who should start, both guys who red-shirted last year, both older guys who have had that initial year to get used to everything. So while they are new, they aren't exactly nervous true frosh who are overmatched from the beginning.

The best news around is that Wulff continues to recruit the big, lean frames out of high school and then have them grow and mature in the strength program, some of whom will ultimately end up on defense. It's the old Mike Price philosophy - recruit speed and athleticism on defense, and let them develop and grow up in the program. And build it for speed, from the "outside-in". So safeties become outside linebackers, outside linebackers become middle linebackers, middle linebackers become defensive ends, and defensive ends move inside to defensive tackle. All in a natural progression as their bodies add strength and "the right kind of weight".

The downside to this approach, well, it's a strategy for the long haul, not the quick fix. No 6-4, 325-lb SEC-style behemoths are walking through the Bohler Gym doors, ready to start from the day they arrive. Obviously Josh Luapo is the exception to this rule. But fear not. This developmental approach will start to bear fruit, and I bet we start seeing some of the changes this year, but really witness the evolution in 2010. Just not yet.

At linebacker, the loss of Trent and all those tackles will hurt. But moving Andy Mattingly back there gives the defense an entirely different personality. He is their big, experienced playmaker who gave the defense some extra energy when he first started getting regular PT over the last half of 2007. And it will be great to see Louis Bland take the field after his initial learning season is now out of the way. Instead of trying to survive, now we can see him attack and lead a little bit more?

Most of all, both units are going to need the other to up their game in '09. The defensive line is going to have to do a better job of putting pressure on the opponent's passing game by applying a consistent rush, and of course, plug up holes and occupy some space up front. But that's just half the battle. The linebackers are going to have to play fast and physical, and take advantage of what the defensive line can give them, which is an opportunity to make plays.

So, will it work? Is the front seven in better shape in '09 vs. last year? Can they not just survive, but thrive? What do YOU think?

That's it for now. Enjoy your morning, and as always, GO COUGS!

24 comments:

WSU91 said...

Great analysis, Sean. A lot will also depend on the offense staying on the field longer to give the D some rest. That didn't happen too much last year (duhh!). I think Bland will be one of the best linebackers WSU has ever seen as long as he stays healthy. He reminds me of Brian Forde.

Not a lot has been made of the fact that Wulff did a good job keeping some key guys on redshirt status, despite the massive tempatation not too. This tell me Wulff has a solid plan for the program going forward. But it also leaves many unknowns going into the season. We could be pleasantly surprised...or not. It also says little about Wulff's ability to coach on the field. The jury is still out on that front, but IMO, we need another two seasons before we can now that more accurately.

We have to get back to recruiting like Price did. It's unrealistic to think we can get 3,4 and 5 star guys in here on a regular basis. I think your analysis shows that we are getting back to the Price approach. I think Wulff get's this, and I hope it continues.

Chris '04 said...

If ever there was a year where losing that many defensive starters was a good thing, this is the one. Normally, we'd be up a creek with this many new faces. But honestly, could it get any worse than 119th? I think these fresh faces are out to change the way that the Pac10 views the Cougs by stepping up in a big way. Will they become world beaters? Probably not. But a DRASTIC improvement will be seen, count on it.

The Coug-A-Sutra said...

Great work, Hawk.

the big thing with this group is health. If we can keep this group healthy, then the sheer improvement in size upfront will make a big difference in our ability to at least contain the run.

But, as we saw in the Hawaii game last year, the return of Mattingly to the LB corps is going to do wonders for our pass D--which was historically HORRIBLE with Trent as the MLB (to be fair, he was fed to the wolves when he was just not ready).

The other side: our defense becomes radically better if the offense can move the chains at least a little bit...That, along with injuries, will determine the fortunes of this group.

Portland Coug said...

I'm not in love with the move to the sutra but I appreciate him for what he is. I enjoy coming here for many reasons but a big one is the lighter tone. Too serious is a big turn off. It is just a blog ladies and germs.

Tim in Oklahoma said...

I mostly watch but will put a toe in the pool to see if I might be welcome to swim with you guys. Thanks for caring enough to do this work. I used to think that moving the chains and controlling the ball/clock should be sufficient to hide a multitude of sins on defense, but we did that with Jerome Harrison and still got killed. So your analysis of how we fix the D provides some comfort. I look forward to your breakdown of the offense because it appears there's some Pac-10 talent there. I know everybody's going to no-huddle spread passing, and we have some designs on that ourselves, but I feel we must bust some chops and knock some people down and block as hard as Tardy runs. We must rely on him as we develop a QB who is not under pressure to make plays all the time. Dwight Tardy can and should be our next Cougar Legend. Then, we recruit an old-school WSU quarterback who we WANT to make plays all the time. Thanks again, and we'll see y'all in San Antonio.

The Coug-A-Sutra said...

Tim, thanks for your comment and of course you are welcome to post here anytime!

And you are right to bring up the Harrison and the 2005-2006 Defense issue. As Butthead once said, "You can't polish a turd, Beavis."

But when you look at both the amount of time that the defense was on the field last year as well as the pressure of being down 14-0 2 minutes in + starting each defensive possession inside your own 50, then the importance of the offense really becomes apparent.

Also: While I like Tardy, i think our depth at running back is too great for any one guy to get off. It will be interesting to see how Wulff and Sturdy distribute that work load and whether any of them can get enough touches to generate tempo.

At least we're almost interesting again!

Sean Hawkins said...

Good call on the Harrison thing. 1900 yards his senior year in '05, but the kings of the 4th quarter meltdowns saw them go 1-7 in the PAC-10. That was the fake punt at Cal, the 38-21 lead vs. UCLA, etc. Kind of shows that rushing yards can, in fact, be a little overrated? But that is a good reminder in how important QB play and defense will go towards actually winning games. You can rush for over 2,000 yards as a team and have an all-american carrying the ball, but if you can't throw the ball with any consistency AND you can't stop anyone, you're still looking at a long, long season. UGH.

I still feel bad for that '05 defense. They were beat up early, and so many young faces thrown into the fray. And of course, Alex Brink's struggles to move the team in the 2nd half, once teams ganged up on the running game and forced him to beat them over the top. He wasn't ready for that as a sophomore.

Don't be a stranger Tim!

Anonymous said...

Love the writeup and agreed, we will see improvements but still a year away. But i may buy season tix in 2010 with the potential of this team. They keep progressing and building up and 2010 looks really interesting.

Brian said...

Great write up.

I am really intrigued by our LB's, I think they have potential to make a huge impact on the D. Bland looked great last year and Mattingly is very solid at OLB (not so much at DE). Neither is that big but they are both really quick. MLB is a relative unknown but I think one of those guys will definitely step up.

D-line is a big question mark to me. Our DT's are not huge (285, 290) but I think they will be asked more to penetrate and create pressure rather than run-stuff, which I think they could be good at (haven't seen enough of them to know for sure).

DE is another big question mark... we will sorely miss Corey Mackay! I like Kooyman, although he isn't the greatest pass-rusher. Feagan I'm not too familiar with, however with his size (I think you said he was 270?) I don't see him having much speed around the corner either. These guys should help stopping the run, although I'm not sure how we will be able to generate consistent pressure without blitzing.

All-in-all, they are vastly improved from last year. Hopefully we don't see 60+ yard touchdown runs up the gut by untouched RB's this season.

James said...

This was posted on Cougfan and i thought it went well with the topic. Enjoy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWkebcRKd4M&feature=player_embedded

Anonymous said...

Great work re: position previews. WSU released their pre-spring prospectus with depth charts and comments and you drilled it.

http://wsucougars.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/072809aao.html

Portland Coug said...

Nony, I think you meant prefall camp release but flip, Sedi did nail it. Props to you. What is even left, the defensive backs and special teams? Saw that Anthony Houston has permanently shifted to corner. His hands must suck because he's big and fast.

Longball said...

Good eye, Portland.

That was one of the more interesting things i saw, along with Jason Stripling still on the roster 3 deep at LB.

With the hits our secondary has taken i am happy to see an athlete like Huston moved over there to shore things up. We'll see how steep that elarning curve is.

Longball said...

learning curve, dammit! Curse these sausage fingers.

Milky Jones said...

Wont Casey Hamlett have to sit out a year since he is a transfer?

BornCoug said...

I think Hamlett can play right away because he he's coming from FCS (is that right?) Western Washington. Missing Mackay is really huge but I hope to hear he is walking soon!

I thought it was rumored Turpin was up to 290+?

WSU91 said...

WWU was a Division II football program (not FCS). Now they are a no division football program.

The Coug-A-Sutra said...

BC: He is eligible right away due to the closure of the WWU program.

Anonymous said...

Turpin - even better. In a cougfan blog recently he was listed at 303 lbs. Now we got some meat to work with!!!

Anonymous said...

It was extremely interesting for me to read that post. Thanks for it. I like such themes and everything that is connected to them. I definitely want to read a bit more soon.

Anonymous said...

Don't stop posting such themes. I like to read stories like that. By the way add more pics :)

Anonymous said...

[url=http://seghan.ru/go.php?sid=35][img]http://s001.radikal.ru/i194/1001/f2/3b8e742581a0.jpg[/img][/url]












[url=http://qzexaua.flackert.de/]buy an electronic cigarette [/url]
buy cigarette cards how to buy cigarettes cheaper buying cigarettes internet
[url=http://cauvzah.weinend.de/]buy cigarettes on the internet [/url]
tobacco cigarettes buy american spirit where to buy cigarettes in new hampshire buying clove cigarette
[url=http://mlwqdwu.xn--baldmglichst-8ib.de/sitemap.html]money order cigarettes [/url]
buying cigarette tobacoo buying cigarettes online arizona buy cigarettes from russia
[url=http://cauvzah.weinend.de/]where to buy cigarette filters [/url]
buy cigarette accessories buy cigarette light marlboro online buy pall mall cigarettes
[url=http://deuaexj.naheliegend.de/]buy cigarette tobacoo [/url]
the legal age to buy cigarettes buy cigarette in kentucky buy ultra buy cigarettes
[url=http://tyouhca.xn--geglckt-q2a.de/sitemap.html]remove cigarette order from a home [/url]
ny mail order cigarettes buy cheap cigarettes in uk where to buy cigarettes for my business
[url=http://uvfaquc.akzentuiert.de/sitemap.html]buy chunghwa cigarette [/url]
buy exploding cigarettes buy joe's slim cigarette in gig buy pall mall cigarettes online
[url=http://cauvzah.weinend.de/]cigarette ordering [/url]
buy camel exotic blend twist cigarettes how can i order jezebel cigarettes buy 1 get 1 free cigarettes
[url=http://uvfaquc.akzentuiert.de/]buy single cigarettes [/url]
buy honeyrose cigarettes buy cigarettes with paypal uk buy camel cigarettes in
[url=http://vjzvmeu.il.gp/sitemap.html]buy cheap wave cigarettes [/url]
buy bidis cigarettes dreams cigarettes cherry buy new york buy camel robust cigarette cartons

Anonymous said...

Nice post and this fill someone in on helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you seeking your information.

Anonymous said...

Hi
Very nice and intrestingss story.