Paul Wulff Radio Show Recap - Week III
Written by Sean Hawkins   
Wednesday, 16 September 2009 00:01
Trophy

Probably one of the most anticipated radio shows in a while, and after today's news, for good reason.  So we'll get to the recap in a moment.

But first, let me say this.  Regardless of where you come down on the Paul Wulff debate that has been raging the last few days, here and elsewhere, when you hear him speak as we did tonight, you realize how much he loves WSU and wants this thing to work.  This isn't like the Ty Willie situation over in Montlake, where the guy was a miserable pain in the arse to be around at the end, closed off and condescending, never endearing himself to Husky-ville.  Wulff IS a Coug, he loves Pullman and he wants to build a winner.  I know it's a PAC-10 job, and with it will come heavy criticisms when things don't go as planned, but let's not lose sight of who Paul Wulff actually is and what he's trying to accomplish.  Mmmm-kay?

OK, that's out of the way.  Now, the show.  First, it was a more intense version of Paul Wulff tonight.  There wasn't a lot of negative or anger to him, but he seemed a lot more direct with his answers to the various questions outta Bud and the callers.  You could tell that something is a little different with him right now.  Whether it's pressure to perform, pressure being applied from those above him, whatever, he did sound a little different tonight. 

With that, we look at ten things to take from the show.  On to the recap...


1) To lead off the show, Bud asked Wulff about the schedule and SMU.  Many people may not know, but this is a home-and-home, and we travel to SMU next year.  But did you also know that we open up AT Oklahoma State!?!?  So the first two games of 2010, right now, are @Oklahoma State and @SMU, both in the heat of the southwest in late summer.  Greatttttt.....Now, who knows if it will actually happen this way.  Would it be out of the question to see one of those games moved, somehow, someway, and replaced with something else?  We'll see.  But that could be a tough draw to begin what will hopefully be a much brighter season next year.

2)  Of course, the QB news of the day.  Wulff confirmed what the rest of the free world already knew, and that is Marshall Lobbestael will start this Saturday, and they have decided to take the redshirt off Jeff Tuel and he will play "at some point."  First, Marshall Lobbestael.



Wulff said that "it's time to give Marshall the chance to play right away in a game, instead of just coming in later in obvious passing situations.  We want to take some pressure off him by having him play early, set up the offense by running the ball early, and give him some opportunities to use the play-action."  As we all know, a QB with a running game is usually better than a QB without a running game.  And Marshall Lobbestael, right now in his development of just what, three starts under his belt, plus some spotty action here and there?  Regardless of the fact that he's a sophomore, he's not ready to carry a team with his arm alone!  He needs to have at least a semblance of a running game behind him, help balance some things out.  So Marshall is going to get that chance on Saturday.

On Tuel:  "We are taking the redshirt off Jeff Tuel.  Now if he struggles mightily in practice this week, we may decide not to play him, but we highly doubt that will happen.  But Tuel needs to grow.  We believe he is capable to play now, and we believe he is going to be an awfully good football player for us." 



Wulff also touched on the fact that we've now seen 10 starts from Kevin Lopina, and while he didn't come out and say it?  We pretty much know what we've got there.  Wulff said "we need to move forward and grow the QB position, for this year but to be stronger for next year as well."  Fair enough.

I know there is some concern for Tuel's well-being, and rightly so.  True frosh QB's aren't often thrown to the wolves with a high rate of success, Matt Barkley at USC an obvious exception this year.  But when Bud asked him about the decision to burn a redshirt and if that is solely the coaches decision, Wulff said it "absolutely is the coaches, player and the family if they want to decide that.  We involve everyone, and if they all agree to it, we move forward."  So this isn't just a Wulff-only decision (although there probably aren't a ton of college kids who don't want to play right away??). 

3) The recruiting class from last year was brought up again, and Wulff touched on how they believe it "is a great young class that we have in place, and right now we are only playing two true frosh in Gino Simone and Travis Long."  They have actually held Darren Markle out of action up until now, so the redshirt is still intact there.  Wulff said that they are tempted to play some of these kids, and they believe very much that this class is going to really pay off in the future, but they are going to hold off as much as they can in letting the true frosh play. 

It's been talked about before, but there reportedly are some good young players that are here, just not yet out on the field.  Nolan Washington, Anthony Carpenter and Jamal Atofau I'm sure are three guys the coaches look at and think that they could help immediately in the secondary.  Washington and Carpenter were both guys who have really good speed, supposedly in the 4.4 range per some recruiting stuff on them.  Even Casey Locker as a safety prospect has 4.4 speed, and that sounds pretty damn good from where I sit right now!  But burning a ton of redshirts and playing the youth immediately, that's no way to build a program for the long haul (unfortunately).  We saw too many young guys play last year when they weren't physically ready, and that wasn't much fun for anyone. 

4) Bud asked about the blow that Gino Simone absorbed (have you seen it?  Here's a link to the video.  Go to the 8:42 mark of the video and you'll see the hit).  Wulff said "Gino POPPED HIS CHERRY on that one" (eewww!) and got the huge hit in a game.  But Wulff said that Simone wasn't knocked out, but had some headaches and has been checked out.  He should be OK, but will be out for this week.  They hope to have him back on Tuesday for next week.  In that same theme, they discussed head injuries and how different it is today compared to the past.  Wulff said in his day, you might sit out a day or so, then back at it and play through the headaches.  Today they take every precaution possible, as all it takes is one mistake and "it could be something we regret for the rest of our lives."  Wulff also brought up about the new lead-with-your-head rule.  The refs are more aware of the rule this year and they will call it more this year.  It's still a judgement call however, and sometimes they will get it right, sometimes they won't. 

5) Injuries:  Andy Mattingly suffered a quad injury, as well as a concussion.  LeAndre Daniels is also out with the broken leg, and this seems like a big loss to Wulff.  He said Daniels "has good speed for our secondary, and he's a physical player."  Unfortunately, the medical redshirt is likely out of the question since he's already had one redshirt year.  Wulff went into that rule a little bit, but, don't hold out much hope for a medical redshirt for Daniels. 

Of course, Kevin Kooyman was already out with the knee injury and he will remain out, so right there with Kooyman and Mattingly that is two of your senior defensive leaders not able to go.  On offense, we know about Gino Simone, but also Zach Williams will be out with the dreaded high ankle sprain.  No word on when he'll return.  One of the bigger names mentioned was James Montgomery.  He had 55 cc's of fluid drained from his knee yesterday as it swelled up on him a bit (that's NOT good!).  He said that Montgomery could return to practice tomorrow, but that's a situation to keep an eye on?

Wulff also touched on who will play this week due to these injuries, and he mentioned Brian Danaher.  But he also said that it's time to see some other younger players as well, including Tyson Pencer, the big 6-6, 300-lb tackle.  Wulff believes that Pencer is big and athletic enough to do a good job at tackle.  Wulff also mentioned Alex Reitnouer as a guy who should help them protect the QB and he will get a chance to play.  Wulff made it sound like they are really going to give some younger players a chance, sooner rather than later!

6) A caller asked about the kickoffs and special teams in general, and why we aren't seeing more kickoffs into the endzone?  Wulff said that is something they are working on and they think they will see an improvement on that this week.  He said they did try to do a few "sky" kicks last week, trying to get the coverage down there with more air under the ball, but it didn't really work out.  Also brought up were the kick-return teams and the decisions to run the ball out a few times already when it looks like they should have just taken a knee.  Wulff said that has happened in the first two games, and that is "not something they wanted to have happen" and "it's a player trying to make a play".  He said with someone like James Montgomery, maybe it's a good idea if he runs one out that is a little deeper than normal given his explosiveness, but that's about it. 

Reid Forrest was brought up, and Bud pointed out how good he has been, the #1 punter in the PAC-10 and #5 in the country, averaging over 47 yards per kick (wow!).  Wulff said believe it or not, Reid is "one of the leaders of the team right now, highly respected by the players."  Wulff said Reid is easily one of the best punters in the country.  Hard to argue with the numbers there.  Finally, Wulff mentioned that the coverage is getting better by getting Johnny Forzani involved as a "gunner" on special teams.  He has done a good job there and may have found his role with the team for now. 

7) A caller asked about Hawaii being "bigger, stronger and faster" and being "too much to handle" for WSU.  The caller then said it's great that we have the verbal commitments right now, but two of the latest names only had schools like Nevada and San Diego State as schools that had offered them.  The caller asked if they should be going after other players that have been offered by PAC-10 schools, and how do we ever hope to compete by recruiting players like that?  Wulff bristled a little bit at this, but took a deep breath and started in.  First, of the two recent commits who he couldn't name, Wulff said that they ARE being recruited hard by other PAC-10 schools, and that information will probably come out.  But he said that they both want to be Cougars.  Then he said it "still gets back to trusting of our staff and our ability to evaluate talent, finding the right kinds of kids we want to be part of our program."  He said they will "continue to look for diamond-in-the-rough types" in their strategy, and he brought up two very good examples - Marcus Trufant and Erik Coleman. 

Wulff said that both Trufant and Coleman were ONLY offered by BIG SKY schools.  Neither of them even had an offer from a WAC school like Idaho.  But what do you know, they both had excellent careers at WSU and both have been in the NFL.  So it still boils down to your evaluation as a staff, knowing what to look for, and don't pay as much attention to the recruiting rankings (to which Bobo Brayton, in attendance for the show, yelled out "It's ALL COACHING!"  :) 

8)  A caller brought up the positives from the Hawaii game, and that they outscored them 20-0 for a stretch from the early 2nd quarter into the 4th quarter.  Wulff said "we are still growing as a young team, and right now we need to continue to build off the "small wins", which may not mean wins on the scoreboard".  Wulff brought up how the defense did actually stop Hawaii three times in the redzone with some turnovers, and that's something positive they can take from that game.  He also said the biggest thing is just the change from last year that people may not see.  For example, he said last year with the "deflating" nature of the first half, quite honestly the "team would have come out and laid down in the 2nd half".  But instead, as a staff "we challenged them at halftime, told them to stop pressing and just go out and play."  And they felt good about the second half.  In the end they had over 400 yards of offense, but had so many missed chances for that number to maybe be closer to 600 in the end.  Wulff also brought up the turnovers, how impossible it is when you give it away seven times, but then said an 18-point loss "was actually pretty good considering all the turnovers and breakdowns and missed opportunities."  OK then.  But in the end, Wulff said "we have GOT to move on from this game, and we will." 

Wulff then went on about how "we have changed A LOT since last year."  He was very direct and clear about that, and this didn't feel like a bunch of BS-coach speak, know what I mean?  He said the "attitude, the work ethic, the focus, the desire to learn, keep fighting, continue to grow and mature and get stronger and stronger" are differences to this year's team.  He even said that they had a very spirited practice today, with a very good attitude.  But they are young, and need to grow.  He also said "but it's going to still be bumpy."  He brought up a conversation he had with Dick Bennett, which we've heard about before I believe?  But Bennett told him when he got the job to "just stay the course, install what it is you are going to do, and take some bullets.  And you will take some bullets for about three years or however long it takes, but just stay the course."  Wulff then said, unsolicited, that "I enjoy this job.  I am going to keep driving ahead, and I can assure you that good things are happening.  We are better today than we were a year ago, and next year, we'll be better than we are today." 

9)  The run-n-shoot was brought up, and how they are seeing it for the second week in a row.  Like last week, Wulff said "they are going to get their yards and points" on offense, but the defense will play better.  They believe they "have settled some things down" on defense and it will show this week.  They will also continue to show a 3-man front and blitz a linebacker, but also mix things up defensively.  Bo Levi Mitchell, SMU QB, was brought up, and Wulff said he's "a very good QB with a good arm and a quick release.  He gets rid of the ball quickly and doesn't take many sacks" in their offense. 



They have some outstanding WR's too in Emmanuel Sanders and Aldrick Robinson, two players Phil Steele says gives SMU "the best receiving combo in C-USA".  Sanders has 28 career TD catches, in fact he's the active NCAA leader in TD catches right now.  He will be "a big challenge to try and contain on Saturday" for the defense.  SMU's defense was brought up, and Bud pointed out that they already have NINE - NINE! - interceptions on the year, tops in the country.  But they also have given up a fair chunk of yardage, indicative of their big-play mentality on defense perhaps?  Wulff said they are aggressive and will give lots of different looks to try and confuse the QB, and so far it's working out for SMU. 

10) Finally, a caller almost started yelling at Wulff and had to be cut off, but he asked some good questions first.  The guy asked "why didn't we stick with the run vs. Stanford into the second half?  Why do you get away from the strength of the team, which is a ball-control offense and keep the ball out of the hands of the opposing offense?"  The guy's voice was rising at this point, and Bud interrupted and said "let's let coach Wulff answer the questions!"  Wulff said hey man, GO EFF YOURSELF!  OK, he didn't say that (but what was he thinking!?!?)  Wulff said "we want to run the ball!  It allows us to manage the game, and we need to run the ball to be successful and move the chains.  But right now, our problem is that we aren't throwing it well."  We have had some long drives (18 play drive vs. Stanford, 15 play drive vs. Hawaii) but we are "missing explosive passing plays right now" and that is "one of the reasons we are making the change at QB", to get more explosion out of the position.

So there you go, the week III radio show.  Pretty good overall.  And nope, no tone of poor us or quitting or anything close to it.  They sound like they are learning new lessons every week, and ready to move forward to try and get better.  This week is another chance to take a step forward as a football team.

Enjoy your day, and GO COUGS!
Trackback(0)
Comments (30)Add Comment
Give it some time
written by Getheroff, September 16, 2009
Like I have said a few times in previous posts. Give it some time. Wulff seems to be building this program in the right way. It has been and will continue to be painful to watch at times, but it is those bitter times that makes the winning years so much sweeter.

Go Wulff and Go Cougs!
...
written by selahcoug, September 16, 2009
I listened to the show as well and thought it was pretty good. I actually felt better about the direction of the program after listening to Wulff. I just hope some of the things he talks about shows up on the field.

I knew Kooyman was out for the Hawaii game and had heard about Daniels broken leg, but I didn't realize Mattingly was out too. Wulff mentioned both of those injuries were early in the game so without those 3 guys, including two senior leaders, the deffense struggled for a while. It is very disheartening to see this team get the injury bug in places it can't afford them AGAIN.
...
written by lucascoug, September 16, 2009
Please listen to Jim Walden's interview yesterday with Ian Furness. He talks a lot about Wulff's naysays. Very intense!

http://a1135.g.akamai.net/f/1135/18227/1h/cchannel.download.akamai.com/18227/podcast/SEATTLE-WA/KJR-AM/IAN_9_15_09 JWalden.mp3?CPROG=PCAST&MARKET=SEATTLE-WA&NG_FORMAT=sports&SITE_ID=645&STATION_ID=KJR-AM&PCAST_AUTHOR=Ian_Furness&PCAST_CAT=Entertainment&PCAST_TITLE=Ian_Furness_Weekdays_1-3pm
...
written by Nuss, September 16, 2009
I had thought that Mattingly was a wait-and-see kind of deal? Did he say otherwise during the show?

Also, in case you're all curious: 55 ccs works out to just under 2 fluid ounces. Certainly, you never want to have to drain swelling from a joint, but we're not talking bags of fluid here.
...
written by bson25, September 16, 2009
We still don't have the personel to be a good football team, and I think that people need to be patient.

There is not a coach in the world that could win with this football team. People seem to compare our situtation to UW, and ask why we are not having similar results to Sarkisian. But, even UW has a lot more speed, and playmakers then our team, and it really is not comprarible. Hopefully, this freshman class is as good as advertised and will give this team the speed and athleticism it needs to compete down the road.
...
written by kaddy, September 16, 2009
Wulff WILL turn this ship around...I'm convinced of that. I just hope the fans we have with outrageous expectations don't poke holes in the hull on the way.

If you want to make a difference, donate to the stadium project, and stop being so negative. Yes, recruits read this stuff.
...
written by Nuss, September 16, 2009
"People seem to compare our situtation to UW, and ask why we are not having similar results to Sarkisian."

I don't think it's a matter of results in terms of the final score; I think it's a matter of results in terms of passion, discipline and execution. It's one thing to not be talented physically; it's another thing to not be talented physically and blow assignments, not know which units you're supposed to be on, come out flat for a home game, etc.
Question for the experts . . .
written by AznIrshCoug, September 16, 2009
How many of the great WSU quarterbacks (Thompson, Rypien, Bledsoe, Leaf, etc.) have redshirted? From what I recall .. it may be none. Just an interesting thought.
...
written by IdahoCoug , September 16, 2009
We were spoiled under Price. Compare the talent we had under Price to now. It's more than night and day. Did Doba just stop recruiting? I do lay this mess at the feet of Doba. Great guy-very good defensive coordinator but not a #1 guy. My god, we barely have Pac-10 talent anymore.
change your expectations
written by Billyblaze, September 16, 2009
OK, I think as long as we change our expectations a bit for this season (I mean how can you not after last week's game??), we will be able to take the next 10 games a little easier...I personally know I was expecting a 3-4 win team this year (and being competitive in games/not blown out) but man with all the injuries once again and upcoming impossible road games, I am now recalibrated for a possible 0-12 or 1-11....still really hope we can at least match our record of last year - woohooo for that - not!! smilies/sad.gif

I still think we burn more redshirts to create some depth and give the freshmen some experience right now so we will be able to make a huge leap in improvement next season but oh well....I really hope we do not have to wait until 2011-2012 to be competitive....such a long time to wait ya know - good thing most of us cougars have learned patience smilies/sad.gif

BB
recruiting
written by Billyblaze, September 16, 2009
I just worry what another 0-2 win season will do to our recruiting for next year.......how do you sell a program to young kids when you have only won 2-3 games combined in the last 2years?? I also wonder what this will do to attendance at home games/lost revenue and getting the stadium finished smilies/sad.gif
Negatives will always be there Kaddy
written by SeanHawk, September 16, 2009
I know you are keeping your chin up Kaddy, and you are going to the game this week with family in tow and doing your part. People like you help keep things afloat. But you can't expect there to be nothing but positive vibes after last weekend's start to that game. It's just all the talk of good things going on, then they rolled out that stinker of 20 minutes that brought out the ghosts of 2008, all over again. People are questioning things, yes, there are negative vibes, but it's also passion and the fact they at least care about what's going on to raise their voice/comment on message boards/call the AD office/whatever. It's unavoidable right now, and until we get some more tangible proof that this thing is working, we are going to see more and more of it.

And I will raise my hand and admit that I was negative after that game. I didn't want to hear about the "small wins" taken from a loss like that, when there was so much that went wrong and that start of the game felt like last year. But I know I'm coming back around after hearing Wulff last night, and I'm very interested in what happens on Saturday with the QB's. Most of all I just want to see how the players and coaches respond to a clunker, see if they have taken another step in their growth.

IT IS WHAT IT IS MY FRIEND! smilies/grin.gif

NUSS, I didn't actually catch if Mattingly was out or not this week. Wulff mentioned the quad and slight concussion, and said right there he's without his two senior leaders on defense. I guess we'll find out if he's practicing today or tomorrow per Grippi if he's going to play, but yeah, in thinking about it Wulff didn't actually say if he was out or not for this week.

As far as expectations, I think they are largely what they were to start the season, at least for me. I had thought we would be a last place team with a few wins here and there, but I thought the '08-style efforts would be a thing of the past. I was encouraged by the Stanford loss, at least as encouraged as can be despite losing by 26 points (a margin 8 points MORE than the Hawaii final score??). The losses are acceptable at this point as long as the margins are close and we see that growth they keep talking about!
But that's precisely the problem...
written by '03CouveCoug, September 16, 2009
Nuss: The problems you bring up have merit and seem to be the most glaring behind the lack of talent, of course. However, I’d argue that when you play youngsters (which are what a good portion of our players that see time are), no matter how much practice time they’ve had, no matter how much coaching and teaching has been done, they’re still going to blow assignments, make stupid mistakes and play tentatively. All of this is simply due to a lack of experience. Even teams that play freshman like USC have young guys routinely make mistakes; it’s just covered up by that player’s superior ability and the experience and talent around them.

I’ll give you that the players could be playing with a little more emotion and passion, but too much of that can lead to mistakes due to a lack of focus. I think Kaddy has it right when he says that too many of our fans have outrageous expectations. I’m not lumping you in with that group, however, I think it’s a little unreasonable to expect RS freshman and sophomores to go out and execute like a group of upper-classmen would.

Bottom line is that our experienced players don’t have enough talent and our talented players don’t have enough experience. We just have to be more patient.
We won't have 7 turnovers per game again---Right?
written by atlcoug, September 16, 2009
But wow, that first half was redunkulous. Football comedy at its finest. Of course Wulff should get more time even if he loses rest of games but with some caveats:
1. We should start to see improvement somewhere.
2. Lets dispense with the redshirt myth. 4 years is enough. Just ask my parents. If the frosh is better then the upper classmen then play them. There is no tomorrow. Then we are that much further along for next year.
...
written by yakicoug, September 16, 2009
Speaking of the stadium project, I work for a contractor and I see that the project is out for bid again. Does this mean it is happening? I thought they were still short on funding?
...
written by LucasCoug, September 16, 2009
To BillyBlaze:

I don't think it is necessairly hard to recruit with 2-3 win seasons. Hell, Willingham pulled in a few great classes without every having much to shout about. Stoops seemed to do it his first few years at Arizona. It is about selling the future, the university, the fan base, the prospective playing time. Each kid is different, but Wulff and company seem to have a good recruiting plan in place.

Keep the faith, don't poke holes in Wulff's ship. In two or three more years, if we aren't competing for lower tiered bowl games, then I think the administration will look to go a different way. There is no sense in tearing this thing down, and starting over again.

Rome Wasn't Build Overnight
To Yakicoug
written by Chris '04, September 16, 2009
From what I'm told, the stadium project is being re-bid with a start date of Spring 2010.
tv coverage?
written by Billyblaze, September 16, 2009
Any word yet if the SMU game will be picked up by fox sports this saturday?? I would go in person but I am down here in Reno in wolfpack country.....I am planning on making the UCLA game though and debating on the Notre Dame game in San Antonio smilies/grin.gif
amen atlcoug!!
written by Billyblaze, September 16, 2009
You are preaching to the choir on the redshirt myth smilies/wink.gif
It is nice to get 5yrs from a kid but 4yrs works fine....and if the freshmen can help now and is the best player on the team at that position, he should play......and how many other QBs have started as a freshman and been fine - Jake Locker, Tim Tebow, etc, etc
Passion
written by Coug-A-Sutra, September 16, 2009
Not sure how it is that some of you can question the passion of the team. I mean, were it not for the seven guys on the ball/forcing fumbles inside the 10 when we were down a gazillion points in the first and second halfs, we would have lost by 40 or 50.

Again, it is WAY too easy to equate our lack of talent with lack of effort. And while experience will certainly help us as time moves along, we simply have too many guys that look like they're running in cement when they try to move laterally..

In my view, the bigger issue is how much attention and interest we all currently have in this team despite the potentially gloomy final outcomes on the horizon.

Sure makes me think that the decision made yesterday was the right one in more ways than one..

...
written by yakicoug, September 16, 2009
I agree. If they are physically ready to play as a freshman and are more talented than those with "more" experience, then we still get 4 years out of them if they play now. Doesn't playing them this year get us better prepared for NEXT year, since that is what we have resorted to already, just 2 weeks into the season?
...
written by stiffmiester, September 16, 2009
From the brief view I got of Tuel this summer he sure has the physical talent to contribute. Bring on whatever will make us better and give us real experience for the future. Let Ocho Rojo get a chance form the jump and establish a rhythm and see what shakes out. Without a view of the coaches tape we can't accurately judge how K-Lo did or what Ocho saw or had available during his stint at QB. It really does come down to trust in the staff. I will give them that for now.
Pretty sure Locker did redshirt...
written by dflynn, September 16, 2009
...but your point is a good one. The redshirt is for kids that are not ready (aka, going to get hurt) or for positions that are so deep that the frosh will not play. This idea of redshirting everyone is crazy talk. Best players on the field = more wins = better recruits, which means you don't need that redshirt because you have some new young stud coming to the program.

Hope we can hold on to the ball this week!
Good call
written by SeanHawk, September 16, 2009
Nice call Stiffy. We don't see or experience what they do. Cougfan had an article that is premium that talks about the four reasons this change is being made from an inside "source" or whatever, so there are things going on that we aren't seeing. And Grippi mentioned in his post I think last night that sitting up high, even he saw several wide open WR's/missed opportunitites left out there with Lopina at QB. And there was even another mention of Lopina's laid-back style not exactly driving them to greater heights, and that Lobbestael and Tuel have been busting their behinds in the film room, etc? I don't now. But all we do know is that the switch has been thrown, and it's Ocho Rojo and Tuel from now on. I just hope they can walk after USC!

Sutra, I questioned the effort in the first 20 minutes of that Hawaii game. They looked flat as a pancake to start out, top to bottom, and Wulff himself said last night that as the mistakes started to mount in the beginning, the team became "deflated". But they did do a decent job of getting them to compete in the 2nd half, so you are right, they do give a rip this year. That is a "small win" we can take from Saturday.

Billy, NO TV from all indications. I don't know if SMU does their own broadcasts or anything, but I doubt you'll be able to see it. And, for what it's worth, Tebow and Locker didn't start as true frosh. Locker did as a redshirt frosh, and nearly played as a true frosh when Stanbeck got hurt, but Willingham resisted the urge and they went down in flames with Bonnell and Durocher. And Tebow didn't start as a frosh, he split time with Chris Leak in their national title year before he took over the next season. Even Terrelle Pryor didn't fully start out of the chute last year, but he eventually became the man in Columbus. But we'll see. Hell, I was screaming for Ocho Rojo all off-season, that if he was healthy he should be the guy. Maybe he'll end up running away with the job anyway?

One more thing - looking at Connor Halliday from Ferris and the QB situation going forward, maybe it actually does make sense to play Tuel NOW? Halliday is a top-40 QB commit, so he has a little hype to him. But if Tuel plays now, then next year you have Marshall as a RS Junior and Tuel as a true sophomore. You redshirt Halliday in 2010, and you create some separation between him and Marshall/Tuel. In 2011, Halliday would be only a redshirt frosh, while Marshall is a senior and Tuel is a junior. Just might be nice to get a little distance between the QB's in terms of eligibility?

Well that sucks
written by Chris '04, September 16, 2009
Jeshua Anderson quit the team today:

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/sportslink/2009/sep/16/anderson-ends-wsu-football-career/
I can understand Jeshua's feelings
written by KopravicaHater, September 16, 2009
Why waste your time losing at football when you have a brilliant track career ahead of you?
Seanhawk
written by yakicoug, September 16, 2009
I was sitting up high, in the Crow's Nest, and yes, Lopina missed several, and I mean several opportunities to hit guys running WIDE OPEN down the field. He does not seem to see the field that well. On most of the opportunities he was not under heavy pressure either. On the other hand, the Lobster telegraphed some passes so bad that we were were screaming at him to NOT throw it. He was locking onto receivers big time. Hopefully Lobe will look much better as he takes control of the offense from the kickoff on.
...
written by Nuss, September 16, 2009
"I’ll give you that the players could be playing with a little more emotion and passion, but too much of that can lead to mistakes due to a lack of focus. I think Kaddy has it right when he says that too many of our fans have outrageous expectations. I’m not lumping you in with that group, however, I think it’s a little unreasonable to expect RS freshman and sophomores to go out and execute like a group of upper-classmen would."

For example No. 1, I give you the team across the mountains. Maybe it's talent, maybe it's not. But the thing that makes me believe it's not all talent is the difference in the team from week one to week two. Clearly there's passion -- as Sutra said, they wouldn't have put together that second half if there wasn't -- but there's a difference between passion and discipline, execution and energy.

Maybe Saturday will show as a blip on the radar. I sure hope to goodness it does and that this team comes out and smacks SMU in the mouth. Their defense is, without a doubt, the worst we'll face all year. We might have to win it 38-35, but it's there for the taking.
...
written by Nuss, September 16, 2009
To clarify, I was talking about the difference in OUR team from week one to week two.
...
written by kaddy, September 16, 2009
As for the stadium rebid, since prices have come down so much for construction costs, the price that it was going to cost WSU originally isn't accurate, anymore. Maybe Hoffman Construction will win the bid this time...I know they wanted it bad. (The CEO is a HUGE Coug)

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Follow Us

WSU Football Blog on Facebook

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!