WSU Weekly Video Show, Plus More
Written by Sean Hawkins   
Thursday, 26 November 2009 09:52


Hello Coug Fans!  Of course, happy T-day to you all.  I'm sure we're all thankful for so many things, including good health and happiness of all our friends and loved ones.  Here's hoping you all have a great holiday today, as we head towards the Apple Cup.

There's some good stories about there, plus the FSN weekly highlights show is available for your viewing pleasure.  It was a pretty good show this week, with a lot of Apple Cup talk.  But be sure to pay attention towards the end of the video, and the HUMONGOUS hit on Jacquizz Rodgers, delivered by none other than Xavier Hicks!  I'm not sure if you heard about the hit, and it obviously wasn't on TV, but wow, he laid the wood to young Rodgers.  As Jim Walden said on the radio broadcast, "he's not even seeing stars, he's seeing MOONS!" 

Some quick links for you, then the video.  First, speaking of Xavier Hicks, a good, quick story from Howie Stalwick on the senior safety.  Yeah, he made a lot of mistakes in his time in Pullman, and we don't need to rehash all of that now.  But you now realize that Hicks hasn't had an easy road, raised by a single mother who had him when she was only 16 years old.  But even with the mis-steps Hicks made in Pullman, Paul Wulff and the rest have stuck by him, and it appears that loyalty has paid off.  Hicks has had a decent season, leading the team with 78 tackles and doing all he can while those in front and next to him have fallen by the wayside due to injuries in '09. 

And, seeing how it worked out well for Hicks, here's a big hope that coach Wulff and the team are ready to welcome back Kevin Norrell to the program.  If you missed the story last week, Norrell was finally sentenced for his incident in September that led to his season-long suspension from the team.  It's no secret that Norrell was regarded as one of the most talented skill position players on the roster, and made huge strides heading into this year before his trouble at the beginning of the season.  We're fans of Norrell around here, so let's hope the program is ready to embrace him again as one of their own!

Meanwhile, a Coug in dog's clothing - Bob Condotta - had this write-up in the Times, regarding the youth on both UW and WSU's roster.  A little bit of a sobering reality if you want to know the truth.  The gist is that yep, UW and WSU are both awfully young.  But you know what?  So is the rest of the conference.  Want proof?  Per Condotta:

However, the unfortunate reality is that while UW and WSU are admittedly experiencing growing pains, it's not as if the rest of the Pac-10 is ready for the Denny's Senior Menu.

Consider that of the top 10 rushers in the Pac-10, eight are underclassmen, and one of the two seniors — Stanford's Toby Gerhart — could be back next season if he's granted an extra year of eligibility for missing most of 2007 due to injury.

Also potentially back could be all but two of the top 10 passers. And one of the seniors is Arizona State's Danny Sullivan, who has already been benched.

Seven of the top 10 receivers are underclassmen, as are eight of the top 10 in sacks and six of the top 10 interceptors.

The only teams with even as many as 10 senior starters are the two Arizona schools and Stanford. No one else has more than eight seniors starting.

Damn. 

While there is still hope in the future as the Cougs grow up.....uh, well, the reality is that they have been getting beat pretty handily by some other young teams along the way.   But instead of getting overly gloomy, maybe this isn't so much a downer for the Cougs as it is a reason to look at the Pac-10 and realize how GOOD it really is, top to bottom?  Sutra and I had a conversation earlier this week, about how tough the conference is right now.  I mean yeah, we have been the "layup" or "guaranteed win day" for every other Pac-10 team on the schedule this year, but, overall it's a good, deep conference.  Given all the youth that has played so well, it's going to possibly be an even better conference next year.  So, all that said, maybe it's time they revisit the idea, again, of ditching the round robin schedule format?  The SEC doesn't play everyone in their conference, nor does the Big 10.  Heck, the Big 10 only plays eight conference games every year, yet they have eleven members in the conference, and all without a conference title game!  In 2008, Iowa missed both Ohio State AND Michigan, and that worked out well for them.  They ended up winning nine games that year, including a blowout over South Carolina in the Outback Bowl.  This whole Pac-10 round robin schedule thing has gone on far enough!

Finally, the weekly highlight video....check it out after the read more:


 



Happy t-day, and GO COUGS!


Digg! Reddit! Facebook! Technorati! StumbleUpon! BallHype: hype it up!
Comments (11)Add Comment
The Hit
written by Chris '04, November 26, 2009
Man, that hit was electrifying. I was about 20 rows up in Section 7 and it happened right in front of us. The sound of that hit was so loud that it echoed off all the empty metal bleachers. It was HUGE. One of the best hits I've seen in 9 years of watching Cougar football.
I missed this one from Hicks
written by SeanHawk, November 26, 2009
But I was there against UCLA in '07 when he broke Breazell's ribs. That was unreal as well!



I wish we could have seen what he could do with some talent up front, allowing him to make more plays. It feels like he could have been a whole lot better if he had more help. Anyway, I'm glad to see he has his act together. Football definitely helped him in the end.
Disagree
written by Soze, November 26, 2009
The Pac-10 round robin schedule is one of the few things that the Pac-10 does right. I agree, it creates some extra losses here and there, but I'd rather have that in my back pocket for extra losses, instead of explaining why I'm playing Florida International or Tennessee Chattanoga this late in the season. Pathetic, SEC. Just pathetic.
Hang on Soze
written by SeanHawk, November 26, 2009
I see your point, and agree that the SEC loads up on creampuffs, but I don't think LSU or Florida are going to be returning their national title rings? And with extra Pac-10 losses come less chances at a BCS title game, as well as an extra BCS bowl. We haven't had two Pac-10 teams in a BCS bowl since WSU and USC in '02. As long as the current system is what it is, we may never get the extra $10 million for the conference that comes with an extra BCS payout. And who knows, without a true playoff we may never even get a Pac-10 team in a BCS championship game again?
Agree, Sean
written by Chris '04, November 26, 2009
Soze, say what you want about the "respect" aspect of the round-robin schedule, but it certainly hurts us in the BCS race. 1 extra loss is usually the difference between a $10m BCS bowl payoff and a $500k Holiday Bowl trip. If Noone else is doing it, why is the Pac10? It makes ZERO sense.
...
written by Soze, November 26, 2009
Yeah, you guys are probably right. I just hate it when I see those creampuffs. Drives me f'n bonkers.
Good arguments on both sides
written by SeanHawk, November 26, 2009
The cream puff element sucks, but given the system, I don't blame the SEC or even the Big 10 for doing it anymore. Conference losses kill our New Year's chances, at least for more than one team. And without USC in the mix, the Pac-10 will barely get a mention this postseason, other than the obvious Rose Bowl.

I am glad they have at least updated our bowl alignments, but I wish we had another New Year's bowl! I would love to see the Alamo bowl (our new #2 next year) moved to a 1/1 date. Oh well!
New Pac-10 bowl agreements
written by SeanHawk, November 26, 2009
Here's the new bowl agreements by the way, from Condotta:

Rose - Pac-10 champ
Alamo - First pick vs. Big XII
Holiday - Second pick vs. Big XII #4
Sun - Third pick vs. ACC runner-up or No. 3
Vegas - Fourth pick vs. non-BCS Mountain West No. 1
Emerald - Fifth pick vs. WAC/Army or Navy
...
written by Soze, November 26, 2009
I was looking at Kansas' schedule... is there anything in place stopping teams from scheduling 4 ridiculously crappy teams (can you schedule more than one D-II team)? The Jayhawks, with a win on Saturday, would be bowl eligible with 2 conference wins. That's a joke.
...
written by chrisb, November 26, 2009
Hey, Does anyone know of a Coug bar in Bellingham that shows the Apple Cup.
More D-II teams?
written by SeanHawk, November 26, 2009
I think the rule was, and may still be, that you can only count a D-II win once every TWO years. So if WSU was playing for a bowl last year, and they needed one more game for eligibility, they could have counted the Portland State game. But this year they didn't get an opponent like that, and if they did, they couldn't count it towards eligibility. Next year we have I think Montana State on the preliminary schedule? Next year they could once again use that D-II win (assuming they WIN!) towards a bowl. But I don't know if that rule has changed or not? That's the way it used to be anyway.

Write comment

busy
 

About Bloguin

Bloguin is the revolutionary blog network specifically focused on helping bloggers get the most out of their websites. We're currently working on building a large network of online communities and hope to expand our blogging coverage to include a wide range of topics.

Advertisers

The Bloguin Network allows advertisers to promote their products and services to our ever-growing number of visitors. We offer both site-specific ad placements as well as the ability to run a network-wide campaign. If you're interested in working with Bloguin to meet your advertising needs, please contact us.

Bloggers Wanted

The Bloguin Network is always looking to expand. We're specifically looking for blogs in the sports, entertainment, and video games field, but are open to adding any type of quality site.. If you're a blogger and interested in joining our network, please fill out our application form.

The Bloguin Login

The Bloguin Login gives you full access to everything our network has to offer. Your name and password will work for each and every one of our sites. Signing up is simple, and will allow you to post in all our forums, create member blogs, and access other cool features! What are you waiting for? Create an Account!