| 05 October 2005
When you look at the stats--especially nationally--the Cougs offensive production is not only scawey, its dominant...Running backs, receivers, and (cough! cough!) even a QB thats ranked in the top 20 nationally (at least i think brink is, harrison and hill are top 5).
Then you look at other indicators such as the Cougs' opponents (and their opponents' opponents' records--hello BCS calculations!) and it just makes you wonder...(as an example, Boise State--the Beavs only other "semi quality' win, just nipped Hawaii--yes the team that got BLITZED by the men of Troy and Michigan State--by a meager 3).
So, what is it Rooster? Was this a bad loss to a bad team that we will quickly shake of and dispell? Or was this an indication that the Cougs are a bad team that will struggle to finish even in the middle of an improved Crap-10?
Finally, what is your preference heading into the UCLA game? Is it better to have them beat th da Bears this weekend, or do you want them in at 4-1 and then onto back to back contests with TWO top 10 teams????
Inquiring cougfans want to know...you go Rooster! you go!
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



